December 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Blogs & Sites We Read

Blog powered by Typepad

Search Site

  • Search Site
    Google

    WWW
    http://accidentalblogger.typepad.com

Counter

  • Counter

Become a Fan

Cat Quote

  • "He who dislikes the cat, was in his former life, a rat."

« Ansel Adams in Color | Main | Who Is a Jew in England? (Joe) »

November 08, 2009

Comments

Good Cliff notes, Sujatha.

The bill has passed (squeaked by in the teeth of opposition) and some of the reforms are supposed to go into effect starting next year. I wonder if public support will increase when health reform becomes the law. Or will the tea-partiers refuse to give up? Also, if the new health care / insurance policies begin to show benefit for consumers and Americans appear to like the changes, I am wondering if those loud voices who are opposing them now, calling the overhaul Obama-Care and the Pelosi-Plan, will scramble to get on the band wagon and even try to claim credit.

But as you said, all that is moot until the "Duel in the Sun" starts playing in the senate chambers. We may be in for a nasty trick ending!

This isn't the final final bill- that's what comes out of the blender after the House and the Senate bill (keep fingers crossed on that passing!) are reconciled in 'conference'. A curious side note (or not), Dennis Kucinich voted NAY on this bill, since he thinks better no bill than a bad one that doesn't usher in single-payer.

Yeah, I know that. Sudhir and I were wondering if we had heard correctly when Kucinich cast his vote. But he is a purist so perhaps it is not so surprising.

I hope the senate Democrats don't dilute the bill too much. Particularly I don't wish to see them letting insurance companies off the hook at the behest of Aetna Lieberman and the the Blue Dogs.

The testimony of Wendell Potter (Ezra says he has a name like a character in a Frank Capra movie. I think he sounds (and acts) more like someone out of a Sinclair Lewis novel) is a bombshell and leaves nothing to the imagination. Every news show should interview him in prime time. So far I have only seen him appear on MSNBC.

As much as I generally want liberals to actually stand up for liberal principles, I don't respect Kucinich's vote here. Yes, single-payer would be nice, and would be a major and important improvement. But anything requiring insurers not to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions alone is a hugely important reform that will affect the lives of a lot of people, and you can't just ignore those people because whatever reform we might get isn't ideologically pure enough.

I turned 65 yesterday. I became eligible for Medicare on Nov 1. I applied for a Medicare Advantage plan through Aetna on Oct 20. I got screwed by Aetna on Oct 30, two days before my policy went into effect. All I can say is, "Wait till you turn 65!" Can socialism be worse?

" I got screwed by Aetna on Oct 30, two days before my policy went into effect."- Would you care to elaborate, Narayan? What happened with the transition to the Medicare Advantage plan?

Happy belated birthday, Narayan. Aetna or no Aetna, you are now officially entitled to public health care. Hopefully, your experience with Medicare will be smoother than it was with private insurance.

I agree with Joe. I didn't much care for Kucinich's "stand up for principles" histrionics either. This legislation needs all the help it can.

Thanks for the notes Sujatha! Speaking for myself, I neither understand nor hope to what precisely the Republicans (over and above individual congressmen posturing for their reelection) get out of anything short of scuttling the process entirely. It seems like once healthcare reform plans - even very anemic ones - pass the long-term trajectory is for more expansive coverage, not less.

In which context, I think it's a quite under-appreciated wisdom in Obama that he's been willing to make all sorts of compromises (eg on public option) to pass the thing. The trick is to pass something, then status quo and the weight of precedent will be on the side of humane health-care. Also, no incremental expansions in the future will have to contend against numbers like 1.5 trillion dollars.

With a sigh, Brian Leiter points out this lament. Obama "and his rascal Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel could have prevented the substandard health care 'reform' bill it looks like we are going to get. They didn't want to prevent it. I think they like it. For us, it's an open question whether it's better than nothing at this point." Damn straight.

Thanks Dean, for posting that link. I went there from Leiter an hour ago and found myself agreeing with much of what has been said.

There are now two camps of Democrats - 1) those like my husband, Sujatha and Anna Quindlen who are patient with Obama making incremental changes to the "business as usual" style of governing and 2) those like me, Leiter and the Revere docs who want him to kick butt... right now!

Rahm Emanuel has been a suspect in my eyes from day one. He is ruthless but not on the right issues. The kind of no-nonsense spokesperson and advisor I would have liked Obama to go to in the matter of health care reform is Dr. Howard Dean. But he is a persona non grata in the spineless Democratic Party.

Elaborately, since Sujatha asked - my problem with Aetna (names and setting changed to protect the guilty)

Imagine ...

You are at the Etna Benz-Yugo dealership. Despite all the careful research you have done you fall for the blandishments of Larry Lizzard, salesman of the year for three years in a row, and sign up for the 2010 Merc SPQR9-Bute - subject to loan approval. Says Larry, "Let me go talk to my manager. I'll get you a good deal."

At home that night you make the announcement to your significant other whose reaction is, "Are you nuts? Get back there and cancel your order. No more conjugality till then!!"

Early the very next day you are in Lizzard's cubicle. "Look, for personal reasons I'd rather go with the Yugo Kero-06 in the back lot." "Nooo problemo!", says Larry with a worldly-wise smirk, "Let me go talk to my manager". The Muzak kicks in and you see arms flailing and spittle flying in the manager's hermetically glassed-in office. "Here's the deal", says Larry. "We've already sent the loan application to our bank; why don't we wait to hear from them, and then we'll change the papers to your satisfaction. Here at Etna Benz-Yugo the customer is always right."

Monday, a week later, conjugal rights restored, you are back at Etna Benz-Yugo with the bank's letter of approval of a loan of $89999.95 from Murphy's Bank and Trust (WHERE THE CUSTOMER IS OUR FIRST PRIORITY), which came in Saturday's mail, too late to talk to the bank. Larry is nowhere in sight, so you make your case with Betsy Hazzard, prime contender for this years award. She nods her head for the five minutes it takes to hear you out. "Nooo problemo!", says Betsy, "Let me go talk to my manager". Muzak plays. Arms flail. Spittle flies. "Here's the deal", says Betsy. "My manager says that the bank cannot change the terms of the loan till the beginning of the month - their rules, not ours. Here at Etna Benz-Yugo the customer is always right! You take delivery of the Yugo, then come the first of the month we'll put in a revised application for a loan of $9999.95. Once that is approved, your payments will be adjusted - starting the first of the year." "I know," she says, eyes rolling, "their rules, not ours."

You are aghast. "What? You mean I'll be driving a Yugo and paying for a Merc till the end of the year?" "Is that a problem for you?" says Betsy. "Let me go talk to my manager." Muzak, arms, etc. "Here's what we'll do. Fill out this application for a refund of all overpayments till the end of the year - one copy to us, two to the bank, and five notarized copies with a detailed letter to the Grievance Resolution Officer of the Commonwealth of Taxxylvania, Bureau of Protection Against Sleazy Commerce and Laws (BPASCAL). You better get started soon - there's a deadline for this paperwork, no more than ten days after the start of the problem - umm, let me see, that was last Tuesday. Mind you, the state needs sixty days to process your application, so you're looking at February or March - at worst. But not to worry, everything will be retroactive till today - IF they approve." There is the obligatory shrug and a doleful look of commiseration. "What can I say? Here at Etna Benz-Yugo the customer is always right. The grievance stuff - I know - that's just how things work, no red tape at our end. Look, if this is too much of a hassle, why don't you stick with your original choice. All our customers say that the SPQR-9 Bute is the better car, and as you know, the customer is never wrong".

"What if I cancel the whole deal?" you say.

"That's your decision of course. But I'd be careful about that. The bank has sent you its first notice of payment already - you know how nasty they can get with late fees, penalties and all."

Key words : Consumer rights, Customer wrongs, Kafka, Capitalism, Sleazy, Third World are Us, Cash flow generation, Red Tape, The other guy's fault, Statute of limitations, Deadlines, Deathlines

Only in America can you be stuck with paying for something BEFORE you decide NOT to buy it, or else they'll sod your credit rating. My advice is : don't lose your job, don't get sick, don't get pregnant, and above all, don't grow old, better still, try not to be born. And if you want the H1N1 vaccine, it is available immediately and free with the purchase of a zero-return $250,000 annuity with Citi Bank - or is that Smythe-Blarney? Where the customer gets the first shot, at any rate.

"My advice is...try not to be born." And I bet nobody's insurance covers a procedure like retroactive self-inflicted abortion.

Narayan,

You made my day. Happy Birthday, again!

(Should we forward this to the Obama-Pelosi-Emanuel Health Care Inc?)

And I bet nobody's insurance covers a procedure like retroactive self-inflicted abortion.

It would, if you were able to buy insurance, pay the premiums, make no claims and THEN opted for the procedure somewhat along the lines of the premise of this novel by Jack Finney.

How divine, Narayan! Errr... Ghastly situation, divine writing, I meant. Might I email the whole sad tale to whitehouse.gov for what a mockery is being made of Medicare Advantage plans by Aetna? They might be able to sneak in a single-payer override on the Senate Bill (one can always dream...)


Ruchira, I've changed my mind about Kucinich's vote. He was likely right about what the insurance companies have in store for us. Maybe the Senate killing this bill wouldn't be a bad idea, if only it didn't take another 50 years for something to happen about Health Care Reform in the Congress.

Sujatha: That then will be a different movie in the senate.

And yes, it will be a long time before another Congress and White House will come together to tackle health care. And Obama can kiss a second term goodbye.

Ruchira & Sujatha :
Please do! I am not plugged into political channels and can use the official exposure and whatever heavy armament that might accrue. (I bear scars from having reached out to a White House appointed Indian mucky-muck twenty years ago. At the time I got the feeling that I wasn't rich enough, or Republican enough, or Malayali enough to merit intervention.)
An hour after I got off the phone with the idiots at Aetna I was in the local office of the Council on Aging (or some such derogatory name). The lady I saw mistook me for an aging furriner, for someone with an appointment, and heard me out. She told me that Aetna was following guvmint rules, that she would help me with the grievance procedure in time, warned me not to dump Aetna, and said it would take me at least ten days to get an appointment to see anyone at that office. What a bunch of wimps! These people call themselves advocates and can't see the Kafka for the rules they've learnt by rote. I anticipate more patronizing explanations of the way things are done in the US of A.

Done, Narayan. Let's see if a response (non-automated) arrives. I cut and pasted the main part of your experience in a letter at the WH website.

The comments to this entry are closed.